PROJECTS


2025


BU MFA 2025 ExhibitionVisual Identity
Scroll(s)
Exhibition Design

Index—Open / Index—ClosedExperimental Book Design
111 FT
Participatory Design

Linear Loop
Experimental Book Design


2024


BU MFA 2024 ExhibitionVisual Identity
Tara Donovan: HyperobjectsPublication Design
Typographic Constraints
Participatory Design

Shifting Perspectives
Publication Design

BU GD Studio Website
Website Design

REACT
Experimental Book Design

Craquelure
Typeface Design

What If / Then
Generative Design

Research & PublishPublication Design

Angular AntiquaTypeface Design
Angular Antiqua, specimenExperimental Design

AI__&&__MEZine

Meet Me in MontgomeryInstallation, Publication

A Designer’s Guide to Pricing 
Risograph Work
Publication Design

Ashley James Keynote LecturePoster

Enclosed Conversations: Levels of Exchange Between FriendsPublication Design

StorefrontsPoster, Risograph

Words In Translation: My Life in FrancePublication Design

Multiple WorkshopsPoster

Selected Voices from Native America
and Syllabics
Typography
Publication Design

Prem Krishnamurthy LecturePoster

2023


Script & ScreenPublication Design

Designing ProgressPublication Design

Animal BooksOrigami Books

APhotography Book

Graphic Design is Serious, 
Not Solemn
Publication Design, Risograph

2022


Family TreePoster
Jewelry CollectionPoster


111 FT
Participatory Design
2025

    SIZE: 30 x 160 in. (poster)
    111 FT is a participatory experiment developed in collaboration with Caitlin Lu. It is structured around a single constraint: a square made of masking tape on the floor. Participants were given a brief, open-ended prompt: “Expand the shape using any of the tools in front of you.” Alongside the square, only a limited set of materials were provided: tape, scissors, and a ruler. Each participant was given just a few minutes to respond.

    The project was designed to observe how people interpret open instructions when working within a visible, physical boundary. Some participants chose to work three-dimensionally, extending the square upward or folding it back into itself. Others focused on translation and metaphor, using arrows, abstract symbols, or long trailing lines of tape to suggest motion, narrative, or scale. A few expanded the square outward into adjacent rooms or down the hallway, playing with proximity and space. Each response—immediate, intuitive, and materially constrained—revealed how individual design instincts emerge when structure is minimal but clear.

    The experiment concluded with a surprising interpretation. One participant spelled out the phrase “111 FT” in tape, reframing the prompt entirely by inventing a fictional measurement. This moment shifted the tone of the project from spatial problem-solving to conceptual play and ultimately inspired the project’s title.

    As a piece, 111 FT exists less as a final artifact and more as a record of process. The taped interventions were documented and compiled into a long horizontal poster that captures the full range of participant responses. The format references the long stretches of tape used by participants and echoes the linear progression of the experiment itself. Together, the responses illustrate how minimal rules can still yield highly varied and thoughtful
    outcomes, emphasizing that constraint can be a powerful tool for unlocking variation and creativity in design.